25 responses to “Last poker hand in Casino Royale (2006)”

1. 

   LordMeMo92 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   3.52 - his face look like he wanted to say like this : wtf? what is that? why he is the winner?
   =))

2. 

   beaston7272 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   @dikketroost: Like Le Chiffre didn’t slowroll the ones before him, even though he knew he had the best hand? Did anyone even bother to notice how long it took for him to turn over his cards when it came time?

3. 

   dikketroost May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   slowroll by mister Bond! Bastard

4. 

   MC1Nie May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   laugh if le chiffre had pocket aces classic and would tell people quads isnt the best

5. 

   Nick100895 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   @gauravnathani
   His cards never changed, the six of spades was on the board the whole time, how do you think Bond got his straight flush?

6. 

   SithLordNefaar022 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   “$40 Million, 500 Thousand All in.” lol he says it like it’s water

7. 

   TheAle89515 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   4:00 Le Chiffre: RAGEQUIT!

8. 

   GreenFenril May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   The only way I can see that hand played is if everyone limped in, The flop shows Bond with an up and down straight flush draw. Also, the big guy had a set after the flop, should’ve gone all in after the 8 went down

9. 

   GreenFenril May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

   @TheAle89515

   No chance for a royal. No Jack of spades, or 10 of spades

10. 

    TheAle89515 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    @nucleareactor007 Was a royal flush possible based on the cards on the table?

11. 

    nucleareactor007 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    @TheAle89515 A royal flush

12. 

    gauravnathani May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    when villain see his cards at the time of ALL IN , his cards are ace and 6 of spade ….later the cards turn to ace and 6 of spades…LOLS ..this is cheating…

13. 

    TheAle89515 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    Was there any possible hand that could have beaten Bond’s?

14. 

    aaronh4 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    Geezus, Bond brings new meaning to the terms “slow-playing” and “slow-roll”

15. 

    psychickofsoldier May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    Dang he had the nuts straight flush on the turn already lol

16. 

    MultiCrazyal May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    i actually had bonds hand in a very similar situation obviously not that high stakes. couldnt believe it when it happened

17. 

    Pietpaddy May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    james bond is james bond… always win

18. 

    harodirt77 May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    @hitmancoolio course i am

19. 

    1337bard May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    @beaston7272 LordRicky2 Now realizes he is colorblind.

20. 

    pokerrock May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    Bond should have done the Milwaukees best celebration dance from the tv commercial.

21. 

    meltdownup May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    Great dealer. He has the players not involved in the sidepot show their hands first. Apparently they were playing for both pots despite not having any money in one of them.

22. 

    meltdownup May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    This is what happens when no one in America knows how to play Baccarrat: we get dumbass scenes like this.

23. 

    henrytse May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    i love this scene. i jumped out of my seat and went crazy when he turned his cards

24. 

    InterstellarApple May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    Haha. Biggest slowroll ever!

25. 

    hitmancoolio May 30th, 2010 at 01:59

    @konatown5 Haha